Chron Prison
Designer
Zoey Sheng
Instructor
Jeremy Bowes
Michael Lee Poy
I want to demonstrate,
a social, civic manner
to approach prisons.
Otherwise,
packing people into cells like shoeboxes,
returning after a short incarceration
would be meaningless
Ascrime rates continue to escalate during the epidemic, balancing incarcerationand rehabilitation is a constant issue for prison architecture. Can thelow-security, rehabilitation-oriented institutions that are so evident intoday's society in a humanitarian spirit fulfill the original definition andresponsibility of prisons? This project argues, through a narrative of prisonrenovation, that a prison can turn into a filthy, violent hellhole overnighteven if the architects design it with the best intentions, reflecting theinextricable link between prison and society as well as the high ethical normsof the justice system. When these prerequisites fail to be fulfilled, prisonswill inevitably fall into the role of confinement.
Site Location/ Site Plan
Photo Essay
Site History
Urban Texture
Icon Model & Concept Model
Situation Collages
Q&A
Some people's crimes are not serious enough to go to jail, and they can participate in community work to make up for their faults
Firstly, Canada's sentencing guidelines are very lenient. Judges impose light sentences when they were able to, and will try to use alternatives to incarceration such as parole, fines, restitution, etc. Aggravating and mitigating factors are carefully considered by judges. Judges will generally increase the penalty if the offender is a principal, a planner or direct participant, used a weapon or violence, participated in a criminal organization, showed discrimination, prejudice or hatred, targeted a special population such as spouses or children, or used a special status such as trust or authority. And if the offender is well-behaved, overaged, seriously ill, with good character, and the crime is not severe, he or she can be paroled early. I trust the judge's decision and that the person entering prison needs to be incarcerated. So the existence of prison as a purpose of confinement is necessary.
The second point, the rebuttal about community work, is that after parole, the judge will require them to come to court regularly to report to the parole officer about their life work, they may not drink alcohol or be involved in drugs, and they may not possess weapons, and they must support their families, and providing community service. So community work here is a post-parole requirement rather than a demand for prison time.
Why don't you go design community work centers or design buildings for restorative justice centers?
After seeing Deanna Van Burn's presentation, I think her contribution to reintegrating inmates into society and preventing people from going to prison is significant, but it doesn't stop crime and it doesn't replace the need for prison. Architects need to design for these details, but the problem of crime cannot be solved at the source, because these reasons are wrapped up in society, economics, family, etc. I want to build a place that is as fair as possible to the inmates and victims, neither overly humane nor malicious to the prisoners, and a universal place to take and calm the harm that the crime brings to society and others.
Why are you not so supportive of Scandinavian prisons?
People have learned how cruel, chaotic prisons can have bad effects, but that doesn't mean prison design should go to the other extreme. Scandinavian prisons cause further secondary harm to victims and their families, and there is no guarantee that inmates will be more likely to repent and be rehabilitated, at the expense of financial and material resources, which are high cost and high maintenance, with one guard prisons responsible for 1-2 inmates is not possible in many countries.